web

Privacy-Focused Alternatives to GitHub (and How to Use Them with Standard Git)

Jon G Nov 02, 2025 · 5 mins read
Privacy-Focused Alternatives to GitHub (and How to Use Them with Standard Git)

GitHub is convenient, but many developers prefer platforms that keep their data out of large commercial ecosystems. Below is a concise guide to the most popular privacy‑respecting Git hosts, followed by a practical “how‑to” section that shows the same Git commands work across all of them.


  1. Overview of Privacy-Focused Git Hosting Options
Platform Core Privacy Features Open‑Source? Primary Hosting Region Typical Use‑Case
NotABug No mandatory analytics; run by a non‑profit; GDPR‑compliant. Yes (built on Gitea) Germany (EU) Small‑to‑medium open‑source projects.
GitLab (self‑hosted) Full control of data on your own server; telemetry disabled by default; optional encryption at rest. Yes Anywhere you deploy (cloud or on‑prem) Enterprises or teams that need full CI/CD, issue tracking, and private repos.
Gitea Lightweight, stores everything locally; no forced data collection. Yes Anywhere you deploy. Simple repos, low‑resource environments.
SourceHut Minimalist design; no tracking cookies; optional self‑hosted deployment. Yes Primarily US‑based servers, but can be self‑hosted. Developers who prefer a text‑centric workflow.
Codeberg Operated by the non‑profit Codeberg e.V.; GDPR‑compliant; no ads or analytics. Yes Germany (EU) Public open‑source projects with a community‑run host.
Bitbucket Server (self‑hosted) Runs behind your firewall; data never leaves your infrastructure; optional encryption. No (proprietary) On‑premises or private cloud. Larger organizations already using Atlassian tools.
GitKraken Glo Boards + Self‑Hosted Git End‑to‑end encryption; no cloud telemetry when self‑hosted. No (proprietary UI) On‑premises. Teams that want a visual board integrated with private Git.

Choosing the right service:

  • Full data control: Self‑hosted GitLab, Gitea, or Bitbucket Server.
  • Community‑run SaaS: NotABug, Codeberg, SourceHut.
  • Lightweight footprint: Gitea or SourceHut.
  • Enterprise integration: Bitbucket Server or GitKraken self‑hosted.

  1. Common Git Workflow (Works Everywhere)

All of the platforms above expose the standard Git HTTP and SSH endpoints, so the same commands you use with GitHub will work unchanged. Below is a step‑by‑step example that you can apply to any of the hosts.

2.1 Clone a Repository

HTTPS (works for every host)

git clone https:////.git

SSH (recommended for write access)

git clone git@:/.git

Example URLs:

  • NotABug HTTPS: https://notabug.org/alice/project.git
  • NotABug SSH: git@notabug.org:alice/project.git

  • GitLab (self‑hosted) HTTPS: https://gitlab.mycompany.com/alice/project.git
  • GitLab SSH: git@gitlab.mycompany.com:alice/project.git

  • Gitea HTTPS: https://gitea.example.com/alice/project.git
  • Gitea SSH: git@gitea.example.com:alice/project.git

  • SourceHut HTTPS: https://git.sr.ht/~alice/project
  • SourceHut SSH: git@git.sr.ht:~alice/project

  • Codeberg HTTPS: https://codeberg.org/alice/project.git
  • Codeberg SSH: git@codeberg.org:alice/project.git

  • Bitbucket Server HTTPS: https://bitbucket.mycorp.com/scm/alice/project.git
  • Bitbucket SSH: ssh://git@bitbucket.mycorp.com:7999/alice/project.git

  • GitKraken HTTPS: https://gitkraken.mycorp.com/alice/project.git
  • GitKraken SSH: git@gitkraken.mycorp.com:alice/project.git

2.2 Typical Development Cycle

Stage changes: git add Commit: git commit -m "Message" Push: git push origin main Pull: git pull origin main Create branch: git checkout -b feature/x Push branch: git push -u origin feature/x Open PR/MR: (use the web UI of the host) Resolve conflicts: git merge origin/feature/x → edit → git add . → git commit

All commands are identical regardless of the host because the underlying protocol is the same.


  1. Authentication Details per Platform
Platform HTTPS Auth SSH Auth
NotABug Personal Access Token (PAT) generated in user settings. Public key added in Settings → SSH Keys.
GitLab (self‑hosted) Username + PAT or LDAP credentials. SSH key added under User Settings → SSH Keys.
Gitea PAT or basic auth (if enabled). SSH key uploaded in Settings → SSH Keys.
SourceHut PAT (named “API token”). SSH key uploaded via authorized_keys on the server (self‑hosted) or via web UI for public instance.
Codeberg PAT generated in Settings → Applications. SSH key added under Settings → SSH Keys.
Bitbucket Server Username + App password (or LDAP). SSH key managed in Personal Settings → SSH Keys.
GitKraken (self‑hosted) Username + password or PAT from the admin console. SSH key added in the GitKraken admin UI.

Tip: store the PAT in a credential helper (git config --global credential.helper store) to avoid repeated prompts.


  1. CI/CD Integration
Platform Built‑in CI/CD External CI (e.g., Drone, GitHub Actions)
NotABug No native CI, but integrates easily with Drone (configured via .drone.yml).  
GitLab (self‑hosted) Full‑featured GitLab CI/CD pipelines.  
Gitea Optional Gitea Actions or external Drone/compatible runners.  
SourceHut Minimalist build pipelines defined in .build.yml.  
Codeberg No native CI; can hook to external services like Drone or GitHub Actions via webhooks.  
Bitbucket Server Uses Bamboo or other self‑hosted CI tools.  
GitKraken (self‑hosted) Integrated Glo Boards + optional external CI via webhooks.  

The workflow remains the same: push a commit, CI detects the change, runs jobs, and reports status back to the repository UI.


  1. Quick Reference Cheat Sheet

Clone (HTTPS)

git clone https:////.git

Clone (SSH)

git clone git@:/.git

Create a new branch

git checkout -b my-feature

Push branch and set upstream

git push -u origin my-feature

Open a PR/MR on the web UI of the host

Pull latest changes

git pull origin main

Merge a remote branch locally

git fetch origin
git merge origin/other-branch

Replace <host> with one of:

  • notabug.org
  • gitlab.mycompany.com
  • gitea.example.com
  • git.sr.ht
  • codeberg.org
  • bitbucket.mycorp.com
  • gitkraken.mycorp.com

  1. Final Thoughts

All of the listed privacy‑focused alternatives expose the standard Git protocol, so you never need to learn a new set of commands. Choose the service that matches your privacy requirements, hosting preferences, and feature needs, then follow the same familiar Git workflow shown above.


References

  1. NotABug. (2025). NotABug – free, open‑source Git hosting.
    https://notabug.org

  2. GitLab. (2025). GitLab – self‑hosted DevOps platform.
    https://about.gitlab.com

  3. Gitea. (2025). Gitea – painless self‑hosted Git service.
    https://gitea.io

  4. SourceHut. (2025). SourceHut – a collection of open‑source tools for software development.
    https://sourcehut.org

  5. Codeberg. (2025). Codeberg – community‑run Git hosting in Germany.
    https://codeberg.org

  6. Bitbucket Server. (2025). Bitbucket Server – self‑hosted Git solution by Atlassian.
    https://www.atlassian.com/software/bitbucket/server

  7. GitKraken. (2025). GitKraken Glo Boards & self‑hosted Git.
    https://www.gitkraken.com

  8. DuckDuckGo. (2025). Duck.ai privacy policy.
    https://duckduckgo.com/duckai/privacy


Figure 1. Git logo (black). Created by Jason Long, 1 May 2012. Source: own work using the official Git logos (http://git-scm.com/downloads/logos).

Written by Jon G
Freelance Technical Writer & Blogger